They aren’t stupid for voting McCain; they’re stupid for WHY they’re voting McCain

October 28, 2008 at 1:11 pm (Barack Obama, Election 2008, democrats, republicans)

For anyone who might accuse me of being partisan, here you go: self-admitted proof that lifelong “liberals” can be equally retarded, can make me question humanity on just as many levels, as lifelong “conservatives.”

My God. See, it’s just that… I’m never sure whether to be disgusted or amused over these things. It’s a bit like a circus act. They keep bringing out weirder and dumber people all the time, and I just sort of sit in my seat observing in astonishment and childlike wonder that anyone that flagrantly idiotic could still exist.

And I think people like that serve to disprove both evolution and intelligent design. Because those bitches’ brains sure as shit haven’t evolved, and whoever/whatever created them sure as shit wasn’t intelligent.

/Elysa

Permalink 5 Comments

Logic (n): The use of reason in decision-making processes; antonym, see ‘Hillary Clinton Supporters’

September 3, 2008 at 4:16 am (Barack Obama, Election 2008, Hillary Clinton, Primaries, democrats)

All right, this one goes out to all the Hillary Clinton supporters who’re planning to vote for McCain— or to not vote at all— this November.

Hello. You’re an idiot.

I mean, Jesus fucking Christ. Get off your high horse. No one is impressed with your uncanny ability to put your own juvenile petulance before the good of the country. In fact, I’d be willing to wager that everyone who isn’t in your camp— democrats, republicans, independents and fellow children alike— is watching you curiously, wondering whether there isn’t some epidemic of retardolitis going around.

But just so I’ve got this straight: you rally around Clinton like she’s the Second Coming because she’s fought for universal health care, higher minimum wages, tax cuts for the middle class, alternative energy, and a timetable for our troops to return from Iraq. Yet you are willing to vote for someone who’s against universal health care, voted against the minimum wage increase, plans to make Bush’s tax cuts for the top 2% permanent, endorses off-shore drilling, and refuses to even acknowledge that our troops should come home.

I’m sorry, but… I’m obligated to ask. Are you aware of a concept known by the modern man as “logic”? It’s a tough one, I know, and something you’ll clearly have to struggle with for the rest of your self-indulgent little life. But for a moment, would you do me the honorable favor of at least attempting it?

Barack Obama— while far from perfect— sides with Clinton on 95% of the issues. Not only does he side with her on them, but he also largely agrees with her on how to implement them. Or have you not thought of that? I suppose it’s possible that you’ve missed all the glaring similarities on that which is most important, given all the time and energy you’ve been dedicating to fulfilling your own egotistic notions of political justice. I mean, really? Really, folks? You’re going to vote for McCain— a republican, a senator with whom Hillary Clinton passionately disagrees— to “honor” your candidate in a poorly-executed, half-assed attempt to ease your own vindictiveness? My God. How utterly poor and pathetic. How, precisely, does it honor your candidate by voting into office someone with opposite opinions and clashing values? How does that help anything, solve anything, prove anything, other than your own conceit? I’m asking sincerely here. I am hoping that one of you will be able to enlighten me with your world-class rational thinking.

Here’s what I’ve been hearing a lot of in response to those questions: “My vote is precious to me, it doesn’t just go to the next person in line. Obama doesn’t have a right to it, he must earn it, and so far he hasn’t done that. So far, he’s failed to make clear where he stands on certain issues and how he plans on running his administration, should he win. It isn’t about being vindictive, it’s about ensuring my vote is given to the right person.”

LULZ. I’ve got to hand it to you, really, because no one’s made me laugh quite like that since Bush asked “what’s the difference between Sunni and Shia?” And that, by the way— that quote up there?— practically verbatim, from a woman in charge at the “Just Say No Vote” coalition. That’s their official stance on the matter. And let me break it down.

i. So far he’s “failed to make clear where he stands”? Well, if that’s true, you’re an idiot. Because then why did you support Clinton in the first fucking place? Why did you hail her as a demigod if you didn’t know where Obama stood on the issues? Wasn’t that unbearably irresponsible of you, to support a candidate when you weren’t even aware of her rival’s credentials? You could have been supporting the lesser person, and not have even known it. So shame on you for being politically negligent and careless. You gave your vote away without having a full picture of the candidates— the absolute farthest fucking thing from treating it as if it’s “precious.” So it’s ironic that you would claim the “holiness” of your vote after handling it like a recyclable Coke bottle.

ii. Secondly, “my vote doesn’t just go to the next person in line.” Well apparently it’s given away without understanding where the hell anyone stands, so you’re hardly the poster child for responsible voting, dumb ass. And no, you’re right— it shouldn’t go to the next person in line. But how about the next closest candidate to your own? How about to the person your own candidate has fearlessly and fervently endorsed? Because you’ll trust her with those 3 a.m. phone calls, won’t you, but not with supporting someone else? You’ll trust her judgment enough to readily place the fragile economy, the fate of the war in Iraq, health care, social security, and nuclear fucking weapons in her hands… but not enough to let her guide you to another politician with shared values? Wow, I just can’t tell you how less and less surprised I become by your overwhelming enthusiasm for senselessness.

That aside, there are those of you who at least show yourselves for what you truly are— morons, in case you were wondering— by not hiding the fact that you’re only supporting McCain because you’re sore about losing the primaries. I suppose a congratulations is in order for owning up to your own stupidity— they do say the first step is admitting you have a problem. You’re on the right track. Perhaps from now on you could introduce yourself thusly: “Hi, I’m ______, and I’m a moronaholic.”

Hillary Clinton’s a big girl. She’s over it, she’s lived to fight another day, and she’s being responsible and intelligent by vehemently endorsing the candidate who best reflects her opinions while you disgraceful bastards smear her hard work by giving a bad name to Clinton supporters everywhere. You’re detracting from her credibility with your cheap kindergarten antics. You’re doing a disservice to the woman you so tenaciously admire. But you know something? You’ve proven that this isn’t about her. It’s about you— it’s all, always, been about you. You care nothing for Hillary Clinton. You care nothing for the issues with which the next 4 years will be shaped, you care nothing for the elections or the consequences. You care only for yourself. Because no one, regardless of political affiliation or belief, consciously chooses to support their candidate’s enemy purely out of spite if they aren’t entirely and completely self-important.

And here’s the truth no one else seems to be saying: it just doesn’t fucking matter. You think the primary season was unfair? Why, because Florida and Michigan FUCKED UP and the DNC actually went through with their warning? Or because you believe sexism reared its ugly head and that’s why she lost? Maybe that’s true, but you know what’s worse than mixing sexism and politics? Selfishness and politics. Your “my feelings before our country” attitude is sickening. You sad little fucks are flocking to John McCain with a rallying cry that might as well be “I love myself and my own hurt feelings more than the troops, more than the wellbeing of the economy, more than THE SHIT THAT REALLY MATTERS.” And I cannot even begin to detail precisely how nauseating and pathetic that is. I am disgusted to even live on the same continent as you. If you want to sob over Clinton’s defeat, go ahead. Cry into a pillow and blare Death Cab for Cutie like a normal person. But don’t you dare jeopardize this election and this country with your painfully self-righteous, self-centered little agenda. It’s revolting.

So grow up. It’s a big world out there, full of foreign concepts like common sense and maturity. Climb out of the sandbox, little ones, and move on into the world of adults. Get some perspective. And while you’re at it, buy yourself a nice hardback copy of Webster’s and look up the term “logic.”

And if that fails, at least you’ll already be close to home, “losers.”

With Love,

Elysa

Permalink 27 Comments

John Edwards FOR THE WIN!

May 14, 2008 at 10:24 pm (Election 2008, Primaries, democrats) (, , , , , )

YES! OMG, YES! John Edwards is endorsing Barack Obama! *Takes a solid 5 minute break to squee like a child on Christmas morning*

Over AIM 10 minutes ago:

ElysaMNFF: YES!

Laura: YES

Laura: JOHN EDWARDS IS THE MAN

ElysaMNFF: 4 SRS

ElysaMNFF: OMG

ElysaMNFF: PWN

Laura: I love how

Laura: all you had to say was

Laura: “YES!”

Laura: And I knew automatically what you were talking about.

This is huge news, and let me explain why:

i. First of all, Edwards’ endorsement– no matter to whom it went– was/is hugely significant. Edwards has a massive following of extremely loyal populist/working class voters. This has been evidenced by the fact that, despite that Edwards dropped out of the race ages ago, he continues to garner votes in the primaries. His following is so loyal that they vote for him even when he is no longer viable, or even on the ticket. Translation: Edwards holds the hearts of millions of important Democratic voters who have refused to vote for either Clinton or Obama up to this point. Now, that’s set to change. By endorsing Obama, Edwards is releasing his constituents to vote for Obama, is in fact encouraging them to support Obama, and with such an intensely devout following this is essentially guaranteeing that they will. And mark my words. They will.

ii. It is also about the type of voters they are. Edwards, like Clinton, runs on an extremely populist message. He focuses on poverty, healthcare, welfare, et al. Therefore, his target crowd are middle/working class, blue collar Americans– the same target audience as Hillary Clinton, and the one crowd that Obama has had enormous trouble winning over, which is essentially why he lost West Virginia last night by such a massive margin: 90% of West Virginia consists of the middle/lower working class. So Edwards’ endorsement is going to be huge in closing that gap for Obama. It’s going to bring those types of voters over into Obama’s camp, giving him much more support in practically the only real electorate weakness he had (past tense now!). This is terrible news for Hillary Clinton, for the obvious reasons, but also because Edwards’ voice has so much credibility among Clinton’s strongest supporters that by supporting Obama, Edwards will not only bring him more support, but will potentially divert support from Clinton by provoking blue collar voters to rethink their choice of candidate.

iii. Thirdly, this comes at the perfect time for Obama. He just suffered a crushing defeat in West Virginia last night, so Edwards’ timing is choice and strategic. Both the media’s and the nation’s attention is going to be diverted from Obama’s loss and refocused on Edwards’ endorsement. In a political system that (unfortunately, but nonetheless) relies heavily on momentum and media/mass perception, the timing truly could not have been better. The West Virginia defeat story will be old hat within a matter of 24 hours as this Edwards story dilutes the news cycle. It reinforces Obama’s stance as the front-runner, reinstates a little lost certainty in his ability to pick up working class support, and reaffirms his campaign as being the stronger, more credible and able campaign to face McCain in the November General Elections.

iv. Lastly, when an ex-candidate formally endorses another candidate, he/she is also formally releasing their delegates. Meaning, the 19 Superdelegates that Edwards had won in the early primaries are now free to support someone else. And who do you think they’ll support if the candidate they were formally supporting has endorsed Obama? One guess.

Not to mention, of course, that Clinton worked endlessly to garner Edwards’ endorsement, so his decision to support her rival is more than a little embarrassing. No matter how you slice it, it’s utterly fantastic news for the Obama camp, meaning it’s utterly fantastic news for me and Laura. Let it be known that Wednesday, May 14, is officially some manner of National Holiday.

I’m certain I’ll have more on this later (such as what this could mean for a possible Obama/Edwards ticket), but in my unhindered excitement the threads of coherent thought are slipping speedily away.

/Elysa

Permalink 15 Comments